Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Journal
Document Type
Year range
1.
Chest ; 162(4):A1383-A1384, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2060812

ABSTRACT

SESSION TITLE: COVID-19 Infections: Issues During and After Hospitalization SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/17/2022 01:30 pm - 02:30 pm PURPOSE: Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum (PTX/PM) has been associated with patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infections. The aim of our study was to assess the risk factors, hospital length of stay, and mortality of PTX/PM among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection in a matched case-controlled study. METHODS: Adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections who were hospitalized at 5 Mayo Clinic hospitals (Minnesota, Arizona, Florida, Wisconsin) between March 2020 and January 2022 were retrospectively screened. PTX and or PM in at least two consecutive imaging studies were included. They were matched to control patients based on age, gender, hospital admission period, severity on admission day and the day preceding the incident. Summary statistics, Mann Whitney-U, and chi-square tests were performed RESULTS: A total of 197 patients were included in the descriptive analyses.The median age was 61 years and the majority were men (70.8%). Patients with underlying pulmonary comorbidities was 2.27 (OR 1.42-3.62, p value < 0.001) times more likely to develop PTX/PM. Ten percent of the total cases had these complications present upon hospital admission.Patients who developed PTX/PM had a longer hospital length of stay compared to controls, 20 versus 12 days, OR 4.53 (p=0.002). On the day prior to developing PTX/PM, 42 (31%) of patients had been on high-flow nasal cannula only and 14 on non-invasive ventilation (10.4%). The highest recorded positive end-expiratory pressure, plateau, and driving pressures were recorded in our case group on the day before the complication and all were significantly higher than matched controls. In-hospital mortality in patients whose COVID-19 course was complicated by PTX/PM was 44.2% vs. those without, 21.1%, adjusted OR 2.71 (p=0.001). Sixty two percent were treated conservatively without any intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated in the largest study to date, that patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 infection and had a PTX/PM had a longer hospital length of stay, were associated with higher mechanical ventilatory pressures, and had a higher in-hospital mortality, when compared with matched controls. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Complications of PTX/PM in patients with COVID-19 infections can occur spontaneously and in barotrauma. Pre-existing lung disease is a risk factor for the development of these complications. Patients with PTX/PM have a longer hospital length of stay and higher in-hospital mortality which is in contrast with existing published data. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Natalya Azadeh No relevant relationships by Meghan Brown No relevant relationships by Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba No relevant relationships by Anusha Devarajan No relevant relationships by Juan Pablo Domecq No relevant relationships by Sandeep Khosa No relevant relationships by Amos Lal No relevant relationships by Shahraz Qamar No relevant relationships by Kenneth Sakata No relevant relationships by Mayank Sharma No relevant relationships by Nikhil Sharma No relevant relationships by Jamil Taji No relevant relationships by Fahimeh Talaei No relevant relationships by Aysun Tekin No relevant relationships by Diana Valencia Morales No relevant relationships by Stephanie Welle

2.
Chest ; 162(4):A972, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2060743

ABSTRACT

SESSION TITLE: Acute COVID-19 and Beyond: from Hospital to Homebound SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/18/2022 02:45 pm - 03:45 pm PURPOSE: To date, only dexamethasone, tocilizumab, and casirivimab/imdevimab have been shown to reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients. Baricitinib is a selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor with known anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the role of baricitinib in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease. METHODS: Electronic databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched till March 20, 2022, for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of baricitinib in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The outcomes assessed were 28-day mortality, progression to respiratory failure needing positive pressure ventilation or death, progression to mechanical ventilation or ECMO, duration of hospitalization and time to discharge. RESULTS: Four studies (with 10,815 patients) were included in the analysis. In total, 5,477 patients received baricitinib, and 5,338 patients received standard care. Pooled analysis showed a significantly decreased risk of 28-day mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96, p=0.006) and progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69-0.94, p=0.005) in the baricitinib arm compared to standard therapy or placebo. In addition, there was a significant reduction in duration of hospitalization (MD -1.43, 95% CI -2.46, -0.40, p=0.007) and time to recovery (MD -0.88, 95% CI -1.34, -0.41, p=0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib improved the patient-centric outcomes of mortality and progression to severe disease i.e., need for invasive mechanical ventilation, in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 disease compared with standard therapy alone. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Baricitinib may be used in conjunction with standard of care treatments to improve morbidity and mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Gerardo Carino No relevant relationships by ARKADIY FINN No relevant relationships by Amos Lal No relevant relationships by VIJAIRAM SELVARAJ

3.
Chest ; 162(4):A746, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2060680

ABSTRACT

SESSION TITLE: Optimizing Resources in the ICU SESSION TYPE: Original Investigations PRESENTED ON: 10/16/2022 10:30 am - 11:30 am PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed worldwide heterogeneity in the application of fundamental critical care principles and best practices. New methods and strategies to facilitate timely and accurate interventions are needed. If built on a robust foundation of physiologic principles, a virtual critically ill patient (aka digital twin) could better inform decision making in critical care. When used in clinical practice, a digital twin may allow bedside providers to preview how organ systems interact to cause a clinical effect, providing the opportunity to test the effects of various interventions virtually, without exposing an actual patient to potential harm. Building on our previous work with a digital twin model of critically ill patients with sepsis, this current project focuses specifically on the respiratory system. METHODS: We assembled a modified Delphi panel of 36 international critical care experts. We modeled elements of respiratory system pathophysiology using directed acyclic graphs (DAG) and derived several statements describing associated ICU clinical processes. Panelists participated in three Delphi rounds to gauge agreement on 71 final statements using a 6-point Likert scale. Agreement was defined as >80% selection of a 5 (“agree”) or 6 (“strongly agree”). RESULTS: The first Delphi round included statements of pulmonary physiology affecting critically ill patients, eg pulmonary edema, hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure, shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), airway obstruction, restrictive lung disease, and ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Agreement was achieved on 60 (84.5%) of expert statements after completion of two rounds. After partial completion of the third round, agreement increased to 62 (87%). Statements with the most agreement included the physiology and management of airway obstruction decreasing alveolar ventilation and the effects of alveolar infiltrates on ventilation-perfusion matching. Lowest agreement was noted for the statements describing the interaction between shock and hypoxemic respiratory failure due to increased oxygen consumption and ARDS increasing dead space. CONCLUSIONS: An international cohort of critical care experts reached 87% agreement on our rule statements for respiratory system pathophysiology. The Delphi approach appears to be an effective way to refine content for our digital twin model. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Expert consensus can be used to strengthen the respiratory physiology statements used to direct the ICU digital twin patient model. With a digital twin based on refined respiratory physiology statements, bedside providers may preview how organ systems interact to cause a clinical effect without exposing an actual patient to various interventions. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Ognjen Gajic, value=Royalty Removed 06/06/2022 by Ognjen Gajic No relevant relationships by Amos Lal No relevant relationships by John Litell No relevant relationships by Amy Montgomery

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL